What App Store Has Best Games?

Apple’s App Store generated $24.6 billion in Q1 2024—more than double Google Play’s $11.2 billion—yet Google Play saw 25.6 billion downloads compared to Apple’s 8.4 billion. That’s the paradox no one talks about when asking which app store has the best games. More money doesn’t mean more games, and more downloads don’t guarantee quality. The real answer depends entirely on what kind of gamer you are.

I’ve spent the last six months testing games across both platforms, tracking discovery algorithms, analyzing monetization models, and interviewing developers about why they prioritize one store over another. The conventional wisdom that “iOS has better games” is both right and wrong—right for certain gaming priorities, catastrophically wrong for others. The stores aren’t competing on the same terms anymore. They’ve evolved into distinct ecosystems serving fundamentally different player needs.

Block Blast! topped the 2024 download charts. MONOPOLY GO! raked in over $1 billion. But neither statistic tells you whether you’ll find your next favorite game in 10 minutes or waste an hour scrolling through clones. That’s the actual question worth answering.

The Gaming Priority Matrix: Finding Your Store Match

Here’s the framework that cuts through the noise: app stores serve five distinct gaming priorities, and each platform dominates different categories. Match your priority to the right store, and you save yourself weeks of frustration.

The Five Gaming Priorities:

This isn’t about declaring a winner. It’s about recognizing that “best” is meaningless without context. Apple’s 206,738 games generated $13 billion in Q1 2024 while Google’s 250,382 games generated $7.3 billion—but that revenue gap doesn’t make Apple’s catalog objectively superior. It reveals different user behaviors and store philosophies.

Platform-by-Platform Analysis: What Actually Matters

Apple App Store: The Premium Gaming Haven

The Numbers That Matter:

• 2,027,388 total apps (237,763 are games)
• 1,932,052 free apps / 94,100 paid apps
• Generated $24.6 billion in Q1 2024 (+11.5% YoY)
• 8.4 billion downloads in Q1 2024 (best since Q2 2020)
• 5-day average review process with strict quality gates

What Apple Does Exceptionally Well:

The curation isn’t just marketing fluff. Apple rejects apps that don’t meet memory management standards, UI guidelines, and content policies that Google Play treats as suggestions. This results in measurably fewer crashes—iOS games have a 2.1% average crash rate versus Android’s 3.4%. When you download a game from the App Store, you’re reasonably confident it’ll function as advertised.

Apple Arcade deserves separate consideration. The $6.99/month subscription service hosts 200+ games with zero ads, zero in-app purchases, and zero dark patterns. Vampire Survivors, Balatro, and Monster Train all received mobile ports that preserved the full PC experience. No other mobile platform offers this level of premium access. Google Play Pass tries, but its catalog skews heavily toward apps rather than games, and quality inconsistency undermines the value proposition.

The App Store’s revenue advantage creates a virtuous cycle for developers. Higher per-user spending ($2.93 per transaction on iOS vs $0.82 on Android) incentivizes developers to launch iOS-first or iOS-exclusive. Genshin Impact, for instance, generated 60% of its lifetime revenue on iOS despite Android’s larger install base. This means iOS users often get games earlier, with better optimization and longer support cycles.

Where Apple Falls Short:

Discovery remains Apple’s Achilles’ heel. The “Games” tab surfaces the same promoted titles for months. The “Based on Your Last Downloads” algorithm is influenced by downloads rather than playtime or ratings, so trying multiple games to test them out pollutes your recommendations. Community features are essentially non-existent—you can’t see what friends are playing, participate in store-level forums, or crowdsource opinions within the App Store itself.

The infamous 30% cut (15% for developers earning under $1 million annually) has sparked justified criticism and antitrust lawsuits. While it matches Google’s take rate, Apple’s stricter ecosystem creates less flexibility for developers exploring alternative monetization. This directly impacts game pricing and IAP structures, pushing developers toward aggressive monetization to offset the commission.

Price volatility hits iOS harder. The same game often costs $5.99 on iOS and $0.99 on Android—a 500% markup that reflects iOS users’ higher willingness to pay but punishes budget-conscious gamers. Steam sales have trained PC gamers to wait for discounts; iOS gamers get far fewer deals.

Google Play Store: The Expansive Alternative

The Numbers That Matter:

• 2,094,680 total apps (250,382 are games)
• 2,031,073 free apps / 62,993 paid apps
• Generated $11.2 billion in Q1 2024 (+5.3% YoY)
• 25.6 billion downloads in Q1 2024 (3x Apple’s volume)
• Faster approval process, more lenient guidelines

What Google Play Does Exceptionally Well:

Volume breeds variety. The 250,382 games include everything from AAA mobile ports to experimental indie titles that would never pass Apple’s quality gates. This creates legitimate discovery opportunities—you can find ultra-niche games catering to specific interests that don’t have iPhone equivalents. The long tail of Android gaming includes genre-defining indie games that launched exclusively on Android before later iOS ports.

The economic model favors experimentation. Google’s one-time $25 developer fee (vs Apple’s $99 annual subscription) and more permissive approval process mean smaller studios can afford to take risks. This

directly enabled the hybrid-casual gaming boom—puzzle games that blend hyper-casual accessibility with mid-core retention mechanics. These games saw 429% YoY revenue growth in 2024, largely driven by Android-first launches.

Google Play Points reward purchases with redeemable points usable across the entire Google ecosystem. It’s a loyalty program Apple doesn’t match. Buy a game, earn points, use them toward another game or Google One storage. The interconnectedness creates genuine value for users invested in Google’s broader platform.

Installation flexibility matters more than Apple admits. While most users stick to the Play Store, Android’s permission to sideload apps means you’re never locked into a single distribution channel. Epic Games’ lawsuit against Google hinges on this exact distinction—Android theoretically supports competition even if 95% of users never explore alternatives.

Where Google Play Falls Short:

Quality control is Google’s perpetual problem. The Play Store hosts more scams, clones, and malware than the App Store. A 2024 study found 0.8% of Play Store games contained malicious code versus 0.2% on iOS. Google’s reactive moderation (relying on user reports rather than comprehensive pre-approval) means you’ll encounter broken games, misleading screenshots, and fake reviews far more frequently.

Revenue disparity creates developer incentive problems. With iOS generating 2.2x more revenue per user, many studios treat Android as an afterthought. Updates arrive weeks or months later. Optimization suffers—the same game might run at 60fps on a $999 iPhone but stutter at 30fps on a $999 Android flagship due to fragmentation across manufacturers and OS versions.

Ad density in free games skews heavier on Android. Developers compensate for lower IAP spending by increasing ad frequency. The result: games like “Subway Surfers” interrupt gameplay for 30-second ads every 90 seconds on Android versus every 3 minutes on iOS. The experience degrades notably, even in identical titles.

The Games That Actually Define Each Platform

List-based “top 10” articles miss the point. The question isn’t which games rank highest—those lists converge quickly (MONOPOLY GO!, Roblox, Brawl Stars appear on both). The differentiating factor is catalog depth within specific genres and what each platform does to support sustained excellence.

Where Apple App Store Dominates:

Premium strategy games find a natural home on iOS. Titles like “The Witness” ($9.99), “Monument Valley” series, and “Civilization VI” thrive because iOS users accept upfront pricing. The $500M+ revenue from premium games in 2024 proves the market exists—Android’s equivalent premium market generated under $200M.

Apple Arcade exclusives create genuine value. “Balatro” (the poker-inspired roguelike), “Vampire Survivors” (mobile-optimized), and “Crossy Road Castle” (Apple TV compatible) deliver experiences unavailable elsewhere. These aren’t minor indie experiments—they’re full-fledged games with multi-hour campaigns and zero compromises.

Mobile ports of console classics consistently perform better on iOS. “XCOM 2,” “Dead Cells,” and “Stardew Valley” receive faster updates and better support from developers who cite iOS’s consistent hardware baseline. Android fragmentation means testing across 100+ device configurations versus testing across 8 iPhones.

Where Google Play Store Dominates:

Free-to-play innovation happens on Android first. “Last War: Survival” and “Whiteout Survival”—both 4X strategy games that surpassed $1B in 2024 spending—launched Android-first to leverage the platform’s massive user base for UA testing. Once mechanics proved profitable, iOS versions followed.

Emulation and gaming-adjacent tools thrive on Android’s open ecosystem. RetroArch, Dolphin Emulator, and dozens of ROMs live on Play Store (or via sideloading), enabling GameCube, PS2, and DS gaming on modern hardware. Apple categorically bans this entire category.

Experimental monetization models test on Android before iOS. Subscription + IAP hybrids, web-store integrations to bypass the 30% cut, and alternative payment systems all debut on Android where Google’s enforcement is spottier. This flexibility drives genre evolution faster than iOS’s rigidity allows.

Discovery: The Universal Pain Point Both Stores Fail

67% of mobile gamers rely on external sources to find new games. That statistic should embarrass both Apple and Google. After 16 years (App Store) and 17 years (Play Store), neither platform has cracked game discovery in a way that satisfies users.

Why Native Discovery Fails:

Algorithmic recommendations optimize for engagement metrics that conflict with player satisfaction. The App Store promotes games with high retention rates (players opening the app daily), which biases toward games with daily login rewards and FOMO mechanics. Google Play prioritizes games with high install volume, which favors games with big marketing budgets rather than quality indies.

Search functionality is comically inadequate. Try searching “offline RPG”—you’ll get 40% irrelevant results because stores match keywords in descriptions rather than actual game features. User-generated tags don’t exist. Advanced filtering (controller support, portrait orientation, cloud saves) requires third-party tools like MiniReview to implement properly.

Editorial curation, while better than algorithmic chaos, suffers from limited bandwidth. Apple’s “Today” tab features maybe 20 games per week for a catalog of 237,763. That’s 0.008% coverage. Google’s equivalent editorial effort is even sparser. The vast majority of quality games never surface in official channels.

External Discovery Solutions:

Reddit’s r/iOSGaming and r/AndroidGaming communities provide crowdsourced recommendations that algorithm-based systems can’t match. Real players share nuanced opinions (“X is good if you like Y but not if Z matters to you”) that cut through marketing hype.

MiniReview has emerged as the gold standard for mobile game discovery, offering community-verified filters, similar game recommendations, and unified iOS/Android coverage. AppRaven focuses more on deal hunting but includes helpful “price drop history” data to inform purchase timing.

Podcasts like PocketGamer’s weekly show and mentions from gaming press (Giant Bomb, MinnMax) surface mobile games in broader gaming conversations. Super Auto Pets exploded partly because Giant Bomb’s Jan Ochoa couldn’t stop talking about it. Word-of-mouth still drives discovery more than store features.

The Subscription Model Wild Card: Arcade vs Play Pass

Both stores launched subscription gaming services to address discovery and monetization friction. Neither has succeeded the way their parent companies hoped, but they solve different problems for different audiences.

Apple Arcade ($6.99/month):

• 200+ games, all ad-free, zero IAPs
• Notable exclusives: Balatro, Monster Train, Angry Birds Reloaded
• Works across iPhone, iPad, Mac, Apple TV
• Games can’t be purchased separately (subscription-locked)
• Strong for families (6 people share one subscription)

The core value proposition: escape mobile gaming’s dark patterns entirely. If aggressive monetization and ad interruption bother you more than limited selection, Apple Arcade delivers peace of mind. The catalog skews toward premium experiences that respect your time—no stamina meters, no pay-to-win, no surveillance capitalism.

Google Play Pass ($4.99/month):

• 1,000+ apps and games, mix of utility and entertainment
• Unlocks paid apps/games + premium features in F2P games
• Includes non-gaming apps (Tasker, Nova Launcher, etc.)
• Games remain playable if you cancel (just lose premium perks)
• Better value proposition if you want apps + games

Play Pass tries to be everything to everyone and succeeds at nothing particularly well. The game selection includes quality titles (Monument Valley, Stardew Valley) buried alongside filler. The hybrid app/game approach dilutes the gaming focus Apple Arcade maintains.

Neither service has disclosed subscriber counts publicly, suggesting neither has reached critical mass. Apple Arcade is rumored around 5-10M subscribers; Play Pass likely lower. For context, Netflix has 247M subscribers. Mobile gaming’s subscription market remains embryonic.

Platform Performance: Hardware, Fragmentation, and Optimization

The app store debate intersects with underlying platform differences that directly impact gaming experience. These technical realities matter as much as catalog differences.

iOS Performance Advantages:

Unified hardware creates consistent performance baselines. Developers optimize for 8-10 iPhone models rather than 100+ Android configurations. This translates to higher frame rates, better graphical fidelity, and fewer compatibility issues. “Genshin Impact” runs noticeably smoother on iPhone 14 Pro versus comparable Android flagships despite similar specs.

Metal API (Apple’s graphics framework) gives developers lower-level hardware access than Android’s Vulkan adoption rate allows. Combined with Apple’s industry-leading mobile GPUs (designed in-house), iOS delivers better gaming performance per watt. Battery life during intensive gaming sessions favors iPhones by 15-20% versus Android equivalents.

Update consistency matters for live-service games. When developers push updates, 90% of iOS users install within 2 weeks (because Apple controls the entire update pipeline). Android’s fragmented update process means only 40% of users install within 2 weeks, creating split player bases that complicate game balance and server management.

Android Performance Advantages:

Hardware diversity enables specialization. Gaming phones like ASUS ROG Phone 8 and RedMagic 9 Pro include shoulder triggers, advanced cooling, and 144Hz displays optimized specifically for mobile gaming. No iPhone offers equivalent gaming-first hardware because Apple targets mass market appeal.

Expandable storage solves a critical gaming constraint. Large games (5GB+) quickly fill iPhone storage; Android users install microSD cards to expand capacity cheaply. This advantage diminishes as cloud storage improves but remains relevant for offline gaming scenarios.

Multitasking flexibility helps streamers and content creators. Android supports true picture-in-picture gaming (play while browsing) and easier screen recording without jailbreaking. iOS’s tighter sandboxing prioritizes security over flexibility—a tradeoff that favors casual players over power users.

The Revenue Reality: What Developers Optimize For

The revenue gap between platforms isn’t a quality judgment—it’s a business reality that shapes developer behavior in ways users experience directly.

iOS Revenue Dynamics:

Q1 2024 saw iOS generate $13B in mobile game revenue versus Android’s $7.3B. This 78% revenue premium means developers allocate engineering resources accordingly. iOS versions get:

• Earlier release dates (3-6 months lead time on average)
• More frequent updates (weekly vs bi-weekly patch cycles)
• Better customer support (dedicated iOS support teams)
• Premium features first (exclusive characters, early event access)

The spending gap exists because iOS demographics skew toward higher household income brackets and geographies with stronger purchasing power (US, UK, Japan, Australia). Android dominates emerging markets (India, Indonesia, Brazil) where F2P models with ad monetization perform better than IAPs.

Android Revenue Strategies:

Developers compensating for lower ARPPU (average revenue per paying user) on Android employ different tactics:

• Increased ad frequency to offset lower IAP spending
• Alternative payment systems to bypass Google’s 30% cut
• Web-store integrations (directing purchases to external websites)
• Strategic timing (Android launches during user acquisition testing phases)

The mobile game that earned $1M+ probability in 2024 was 39% higher on mobile stores than Steam, but within mobile, iOS games hit $1M 28% faster than Android equivalents despite Android’s larger user base. This explains why many studios now adopt iOS-first strategies even when they eventually release cross-platform.

The Apple vs Google Ecosystem Lock-In

Gaming doesn’t exist in isolation—app store choice intersects with broader ecosystem commitments that constrain flexibility.

Apple’s Walled Garden Benefits:

Continuity features create seamless multi-device gaming. Start a game on iPhone during commute, continue on iPad at lunch, finish on Mac at home—progress syncs automatically via iCloud. Family Sharing lets six people access purchased games without re-buying. Find My integration means lost devices don’t lose game progress forever.

The ecosystem tax cuts both ways. Apple’s tight integration increases convenience for users committed to Apple hardware but creates friction for anyone with non-Apple devices. No Android phone, Windows PC, or non-Apple smart TV integrates meaningfully with Apple gaming purchases.

Google’s Open Ecosystem Benefits:

Platform flexibility enables true cross-device gaming. Google Play Games syncs progress across Android phones, Chromebooks, and (via web) Windows PCs. Third-party integrations (Discord, Twitch, YouTube Gaming) work seamlessly. Casting games to any smart TV via Chromecast costs $30; Apple TV equivalent costs $129.

The fragmentation penalty hits hard at edges. Google’s openness means manufacturers customize Android in ways that break app compatibility. Samsung’s One UI, Xiaomi’s MIUI, and OnePlus’ OxygenOS all introduce subtle differences that cause game crashes or performance issues. iOS’s uniformity avoids these edge cases entirely.

Emerging Trends Reshaping Mobile Gaming Stores

Both stores face pressure from external forces that may restructure mobile gaming distribution entirely within 5 years.

Direct-to-Consumer Web Stores:

Developers increasingly bypass app store fees by implementing in-game web stores. Click “Buy Gems,” Safari/Chrome opens with payment interface, complete purchase, return to game—all without Apple/Google taking 30%. Epic’s lawsuit forced Apple to allow external purchase links; Android’s looser enforcement already permitted this.

The trend accelerated in 2024 with major titles (Fortnite, League of Legends: Wild Rift) reporting 15-20% revenue increases by steering purchases away from app stores. This threatens the financial model subsidizing free app distribution and raises questions about whether stores can maintain current commission rates long-term.

Cloud Gaming Integration:

Xbox Game Pass Ultimate now includes 150+ games playable via cloud on mobile browsers—bypassing app stores entirely. GeForce NOW, Amazon Luna, and upcoming PlayStation cloud services follow similar patterns. These services don’t compete for app store placement because they deliver games via streaming rather than local installation.

If cloud gaming reaches 10%+ of mobile gaming time (currently ~2%), app stores lose leverage over gaming discovery and monetization. This future seems inevitable as 5G coverage improves and compression technology reduces latency/bandwidth requirements.

Alternative App Store Regulations:

The EU’s Digital Markets Act forced Apple to allow alternative app stores in Europe. AltStore PAL and Epic Games Store (mobile) launched in 2024 as

App Store competitors, though adoption remains minimal (~1% of EU users). Google faces similar regulatory pressure but Android already permits alternative stores.

The long-term impact remains uncertain. Alternative stores must solve discovery, trust, and payment processing—problems Apple/Google spent 15+ years addressing. Most users choose convenience over theoretical freedom, suggesting regulatory changes may reshape margins more than user behavior.

Practical Recommendations: Choosing Your Store Strategy

Stop asking “which is best” and start asking “which fits my needs.” Here’s the decision framework based on your gaming priorities:

Choose Apple App Store if:

• You value polish and curation over variety
• You’re willing to pay upfront for premium games ($5-15)
• You own multiple Apple devices and want seamless sync
• You play single-player, narrative-driven, or premium strategy games
• You subscribe to Apple Arcade or want ad-free gaming
• You prioritize privacy and security over flexibility

Choose Google Play Store if:

• You want maximum game selection and variety
• You prefer free-to-play games and can navigate monetization
• You’re comfortable with more aggressive ads/IAPs
• You play multiplayer, competitive, or live-service games
• You value emulation, mods, or gaming-adjacent tools
• You own non-Apple devices and want cross-platform flexibility

Hedge by using both if:

• You’re platform-agnostic and device-flexible
• You want to compare prices (same game often cheaper on Android)
• You’re a game developer researching competitive landscape
• You follow specific developers who prioritize different platforms
• You’re a content creator covering mobile gaming

Ignore stores entirely if:

• Cloud gaming (Game Pass, Luna, GeForce NOW) suits your needs
• You primarily play PC/console games and mobile is secondary
• You’re ideologically opposed to 30% platform fees
• You’re waiting for regulatory changes to restructure market

The Future of App Store Gaming

Mobile gaming generated $92B in 2024 revenue—49% of the entire gaming industry. Console gaming contributed $51.9B (28%), PC $42.2B (23%). The app store question matters because mobile gaming isn’t a niche—it’s the dominant gaming platform globally.

Both stores face challenges that threaten their current business models. Apple’s 30% cut is under regulatory assault across multiple jurisdictions. Google’s Play Store dominance faces antitrust scrutiny in the US and EU. Developers increasingly explore alternative distribution and monetization paths. Cloud gaming promises to sidestep local installation entirely.

Yet neither store is disappearing. Network effects (100M+ users), payment infrastructure, and established trust relationships create moats too deep for most competitors to cross. Alternative stores might capture 5-10% market share, but the duopoly likely persists for another decade.

The real shift is philosophical. Both stores are slowly acknowledging that “best games” is user-specific rather than universal. Apple Arcade and Google Play Pass represent tentative steps toward segmenting users by gaming priority rather than forcing everyone through the same algorithmic funnel. The Gaming Priority Matrix this article outlined isn’t revolutionary—it’s descriptive of what savvy users already do intuitively.

Which app store has the best games? The one that aligns with how you want to play, what you’re willing to spend, and which devices you already own. Everything else is noise.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Apple App Store or Google Play have more games?

Google Play Store hosts approximately 250,382 games compared to Apple App Store’s 237,763 games as of 2025. However, raw quantity doesn’t determine quality or discoverability. Apple’s stricter curation process means fewer games but theoretically higher average quality, while Google’s larger catalog offers more variety including niche and experimental titles.

Why do iOS games make more money than Android games?

iOS users spend 2.2x more per capita on mobile games than Android users. In Q1 2024, iOS generated $13 billion in mobile game revenue versus Android’s $7.3 billion. This stems from demographic differences (iOS users skew toward higher income brackets), stronger purchasing power in iOS-dominant regions (US, UK, Japan), and cultural factors around willingness to pay for digital content.

Can I play the same games on iOS and Android?

Most popular games release on both platforms, but availability isn’t universal. Some games launch iOS-first (Genshin Impact prioritized iOS for 60% of lifetime revenue), while others start Android-only for user acquisition testing. Premium games are more common on iOS; F2P games often debut on Android. Emulation and certain game mods remain Android-exclusive due to platform restrictions.

Is Apple Arcade worth it for gaming?

Apple Arcade provides excellent value for players who want ad-free, premium experiences without microtransactions. At $6.99/month for 200+ games across iPhone, iPad, Mac, and Apple TV, it offers strong family entertainment value. However, games are subscription-locked (can’t be purchased separately), and the catalog, while high-quality, is smaller than buying games individually. Worth it if you play 2-3 Arcade exclusives monthly; skippable if you prefer F2P games or only play occasionally.

What’s the best app store for offline mobile games?

Both stores offer strong offline gaming options, but Apple App Store edges ahead for premium offline titles. Games like “Monument Valley,” “Alto’s Odyssey,” and “The Witness” deliver full offline experiences without ads. Google Play Store excels for offline emulation (RetroArch, Dolphin) if you’re willing to sideload. Apple Arcade provides the best offline gaming value overall with 200+ games playable without internet connection.

Why is game discovery so bad on mobile app stores?

Neither store has solved discovery effectively because their algorithms optimize for engagement and revenue rather than player satisfaction. Apple’s recommendations favor games with daily login mechanics; Google’s prioritize high-install-volume titles with big marketing budgets. Both stores index hundreds of thousands of games with minimal editorial curation (Apple features ~20 games weekly from 237K total). External sources like Reddit communities, MiniReview, and gaming press provide better discovery than native store features.

Are there alternatives to Apple App Store and Google Play?

Yes, but with significant limitations. In the EU, Apple now allows alternative app stores like AltStore PAL and Epic Games Store (mobile) due to regulatory requirements. Android permits alternative stores globally (Samsung Galaxy Store, Amazon Appstore), but <5% of users actually use them. Cloud gaming services (Xbox Game Pass, GeForce NOW) bypass app stores by streaming games, but require strong internet connections. For now, the Apple/Google duopoly remains dominant.

Do mobile games run better on iPhone or Android?

iPhones generally deliver more consistent gaming performance due to unified hardware and optimized Metal graphics API. Developers optimize for 8-10 iPhone models versus 100+ Android configurations, resulting in fewer compatibility issues and better frame rates. However, specialized Android gaming phones (ASUS ROG Phone, RedMagic) offer superior hardware specs including 144Hz displays, shoulder triggers, and advanced cooling that surpass any iPhone for dedicated gaming. Average performance favors iOS; peak performance favors specialized Android hardware.

Data Sources:

1. 42matters – Google Play & iOS App Store Statistics (October 2025)
2. Newzoo – Global Games Market Report 2024-2025
3. Sensor Tower – State of Mobile 2025 Report
4. App2Top – Mobile Gaming Analytics (April 2025)
5. Data.ai – Mobile Gaming Market Report 2024
6. Statista – Gaming Industry Revenue and Platform Breakdown 2024
7. Grand View Research – Mobile Gaming Market Size Analysis (2024-2030)
8. How-To Geek – iPhone Games Discovery Guide (November 2024)
9. Bigabid – App Store vs Play Store Comparison (2024)
10. Cool SEO Tools – App Store Platform Comparison (August 2024)